I've previously cited textbooks as evidence for the poor penetration of understanding of cultural evolution. However, textbooks are typically conservative and out-of-date - perhaps this isn't the best way to sample recent developments.Annual reviews may offer another perspective on the issue. For instance, here is New Scientist's 2013 annual review: of "evolution and life sciences":
It seems as though this scores zero for understanding of cultural evolution.
The reviews from previous years tell a similar story:
The negative effect of carving the humanities out of the life sciences - and then not properly studying them scientifically - continues to be devastating.
As we enter 2014, the field of cultural evolution could evidently still do with some more promotional activity - to improve public knowledge and understanding of this important topic.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment