It is common knowledge that people inherit the environment of their parents - along with their parents genes. They inherit the local climate, the local language, government and religion - along with traits coded in DNA. These are examples of positional inheritance.
Many other organisms lack good dispersal strategies and exhibit the same kind of effect. Rabbits tend to inherit the warren of their parents. Corals inherit their parent's reef - and so on. Much the same is true of many inorganic natural forms. For example:
- Splitting raindrops - produce offspring that inherit their parent's position.
- Propagating cracks - when a crack tip divides the offspring crack tips start their lives nearby.
- Nuclear decay - when atoms split, the offspring particles originate near the parent atom.
Since positional inheritance is so fundamental, how come you have never heard of it before? How come searching for the term just turns up this page? Well, there are some "nearby" terms, which have received more attention historically. Ecological inheritance, environmental inheritance and niche inheritance. These terms are fine - but they simply don't mean the same thing as positional inheritance. Positional inheritance is the inheritance of spatial position. That often comes with a bunch of other things as well - but not necessarily.
Helpful illustrations:
Resources
References
- Tyler, Tim (2012) Positional inheritance (this page)
- Tyler, Tim (2012) Positional inheritance (video)
- Tyler, Tim (2013) Velocity inheritance
- Tyler, Tim (2015) Fitness landscapes and positional inheritance
- Tyler, Tim (2015) Positional inheritance and heritable fitness
- Tyler, Tim (2015) Peter Godfrey-Smith on positional inheritance
- Tyler, Tim (2015) The smoothness of nature
- Tyler, Tim (2015) Crack propagation in slow motion
- Tyler, Tim (2016) Book chapter on the topic
Dear Tim Tyler
ReplyDeleteI wrote the following in a post, which though not quite correlated with positional inheritance can benefit from the distinctions this concept may enable. Can you please let me know if there are any major flaws in this thought exercise or conjecture which I have indulged in
http://novelvig.blogspot.fi/2012/11/on-local-enhancement-and-its-cost.html
Best regards